You can call us at 314-576-1400 or email us for a free, immediate, and personal telemedicine consultation with Dr. Silber. read more

Infertile patients cannot afford to wait for treatment while their eggs get older.

Dr. Sherman Silber, Infertility Center of St. Louis, is offering free video consultations for patients who need to plan now for their treatment while stay-at-home orders are in place. He is talking to and evaluating patients in their home to comply with social distancing measures.

Dr. Silber is discovering that patients actually prefer this method of telemedicine consultation over the conventional office visit. Patients have conveyed that “it is so much more convenient and less stressful” to have a free telemedicine personal consultation than to take a day off from work to travel to the doctor’s office and sit with other nervous patients in the waiting room.

The COVID-19 pandemic is thus changing much of the way we will do things in the future, and for the better. “Our patients are surprisingly much happier with this approach. Of course, at some point we need to perform hands on treatment. But with this new manner of seeing patients, we can come to the right diagnosis and treatment plan for most patients more efficiently, quickly, and painlessly, with no loss of personal one-on-one communication.” This is a very welcome new era of telemedicine that has been forced on us by the current difficult times.

Generation of three human induced pluripotent stem cell sublines (UCLAi005-A, UCLAi005-B and UCLAi005-C) for reproductive science research

By: Erica C. Pandolfi, Timothy J. Hunt, Sierra Goldsmith, Kellie Hurlbut, Sherman J. Silber, Amander T. Clark

July 2021

Download PDF version

Abstract

We generated three human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) sublines from human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) (MZT05) generated from a skin biopsy donated from a previously fertile woman. The skin biopsy was broadly consented for generating hiPSC lines for biomedical research, including unique consent specifically for studying human fertility, infertility and germ cell differentiation. hiPSCs were reprogrammed using Sendai virus vectors and were subsequently positive for markers of self-renewal. Pluripotency was further verified using PluriTest analysis and in vitro differentiation was tested using Taqman Real-Time PCR assays. These sublines serve as controls for hiPSC research projects aimed at understanding the cell and molecular regulation of female fertility.

Download PDF version

Resource Table

Unique stem cell lines identifier UCLAi005-A
UCLAi005-B
UCLAi005-C
Alternative names of stem cell lines MZT05-D
MZT05-F
MZT05-L
Institution UCLA
Contact information of distributor Dr. Amander Clark
Type of cell lines hiPSC
Origin Human
Cell Source Fibroblasts
Clonality Clonal
Method of reprogramming Sendai, OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, and c-MYC
Multiline rationale Isogenic clones
Gene modification No
Type of modification N/A
Associated disease None
Gene/locus N/A
Method of modification N/A
Name of transgene or resistance N/A
Inducible/constitutive system N/A
Date archived/stock date 03/05/2019
Cell line repository/bank https://hpscreg.eu/cell-line/UCLAi005-B
https://hpscreg.eu/cell-line/UCLAi005-C
https://hpscreg.eu/cell-line/UCLAi005-A
Ethical approval UCLA Office of the Human Resource Protection Program- IRB#16-001176-CR-00002 and UCLA Embryonic Stem Cell Research Oversight Committee (ESCRO# 20016-003)

 


1. Resource utility

Differentiation of the human germline is a process that links humanity from one generation to the next. Here, we generated hiPSC sublines specifically consented for fertility and infertility research including the differentiation of germ cells. These sublines were derived from a patient with previously known fertility, and can be used as controls for germline and reproductive science research.

2. Resource details

Germline cell research involving the specification and differentiation of germline cells from hiPSCs can raise ethical concerns due to the moral significance of reproduction. The strong opinions generated by some groups for reproductive science research, and creation of gametes using hiPSCs indicates that it could be important to inform tissue donors that their donation will be used specifically for creation of germ cells and gametes from hiPSCs. In addition to this specific consent, it is equally important to consider broad consent from donating patients to cover any potential future unanticipated research, and to facilitate the sharing of generated hiPSC lines and sublines. Thus, we created hiPSC sublines UCLAi005-A (MZT05-D), UCLAi005-B (MZT05-F), and UCLAi005-C (MZT05-L) to fill a void in the availability of verified control hiPSCs for fertility research where the reproductive status of the donor is known.

We generated three integration-free hiPSC sublines from human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs). Fibroblasts were derived from a skin punch biopsy from a 47-year-old woman who was previously fertile (Fig. 1). These fibroblasts (MZT05) were reprogrammed to hiPSCs using the non-integrating recombinant Sendai virus containing reprogramming factors OCT3/4, SOX2, KLF4 and c-MYC4 (Tokusumi et al., 2002). Twenty-seven days after the transduction, individual colonies were manually picked onto mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cells to create the sublines. We selected three sublines called MZT05-D, MZT05-F and MZT05-L and characterized their self-renewal and pluripotency (Table 1, Table 2 ). All hiPSC sublines exhibited typical pluripotent stem cell morphology (Fig. 1A) and markers of self-renewal, as confirmed through immunofluorescence staining for NANOG, OCT4 and TRA-1-81 and SSEA-4 (Fig. 1B) and flow cytometry (Fig. 1E). The reprogrammed cells and the initial fibroblasts displayed a normal 46, XX karyotype (Fig. 1C), and did not express the exogenous reprogramming factors from passage 10 (Fig. 1D) (expected band size SeV: 181 bp, c-MYC: 532 bp, klf: 410 bp, KOS: 501 bp). To confirm that the hiPSC sublines originated from the donated fibroblasts, short tandem repeat (STR) analysis was conducted demonstrating that each of the three hiPSC lines were identical to the original HDFs (MZT05). We also confirmed that MZT05-D, MZT05-F, and MZT05-L were negative for mycoplasma through routine mycoplasma testing (Supplementary figure 1). To evaluate pluripotency of these lines, MZT05-D, MZT05-F, MZT05-L were assessed using a PluriTest analysis (Müller et al., 2011) (Fig. 1F). The ability of each hiSPC subline to differentiate into the three germ layers was assessed using Taqman Real-Time PCR assays for markers of ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm (Fig. 1G). This resource is a complement to two previous publications involving the derivation of three sublines from an un-related woman who was previously fertile (Pandolfi et al., 2019) and six sublines from a pair of monozygotic twins discordant for ovarian failure (Pandolfi et al., 2021).

Fig. 1.

Table 1. Summary of lines.

iPSC line names Abbreviation in figures Gender Age Ethnicity Genotype of locus Disease
UCLAi005-A MZT05-D Female 47 Asian N/A None
UCLAi005-B MZT05-F Female 47 Asian N/A None
UCLAi005-C MZT05-L Female 47 Asian N/A None

Table 2. Characterization and validation.

Classification Test Result Data
Morphology Bright Field Normal Fig. 1 panel A
Phenotype Immunofluorescence Positive for self-renewal markers: OCT4, NANOG, SSEA-4, Tra-1-81 Fig. 1 panel B
Flow cytometry MZT05D:
Tra 1-81: 94.9%, SSEA-4: 80.4%
MZT05F:
Tra 1-81: 82.3%, SSEA-4: 81.0%
MZT05L:
Tra 1-81: 87.8%, SSEA-4: 92.5%
Fig. 1 panel E
Genotype Karyotype (G-banding) and resolution 46,XX Fig. 1 panel C
Identity Microsatellite PCR (mPCR) OR
STR analysis
Performed Supplementary Fig. 2
16 sites tested, all three lines match each other, and the HDFs Supplementary Fig. 2
Mutation analysis (IF APPLICABLE) Sequencing N/A  
Southern Blot OR WGS N/A  
Microbiology and virology Mycoplasma Mycoplasma testing by Luminescence Supplementary Fig. 1
Differentiation potential PluriTest Pluripotent Fig. 1 panel F
In vitro Differentiation Ectoderm, Mesoderm, Endoderm potential Fig. 1 Panel G
Donor screening (OPTIONAL) N/A    
Genotype additional info (OPTIONAL) N/A    
N/A    

3. Materials and methods

3.1. Maintenance of hiPSC lines

Undifferentiated hiPSC subline cells were cultured on a feeder layer of mitomycin C-treated murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) in hESC media (DMEM/F-12) (Life Technologies), 20% KSR (Life Technologies), 10 ng/mL bFGF (R&D Systems), 1% nonessential amino acids (Life Technologies), 2 mM L-glutamine (Life Technologies), Primocin™ (Invivogen), and 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma). Media was changed daily and colonies were passaged as clumps with collagenase (ThermoFisher, 17104019) 1:4–1:6 every 7 days without rock inhibitor . Cells were cultured in an incubator at 37°, 5.0% CO2.

4. Fibroblast derivation

A 1 mm skin punch biopsy was dissected and then digested in Collagenase IV (Life Technologies) for 1 h at 37 °C, 5.0% CO2. The digested pieces were then plated down on 0.1% gelatin (Sigma) coated (Millipore) plates in human fibroblast media, 15% Fetal bovine serum (GE Healthcare), 1% Non-Essential Amino Acids (Invitrogen), 1% Glutamax, (GibcoTM), 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin-Glutamine (Gibco), and Primocin (Invivogen), at 37°, 5.0% CO2. Outgrowths of fibroblasts were monitored for two weeks and the media was changed every three days. Fibroblasts were passaged using 0.05% Trypsin (Gibco) and re-plated, the derived cells were termed MZT05.

5. Reprogramming the fibroblasts

Fibroblasts were thawed and cultivated in human fibroblast medium. When ~80% confluent, the MZT05 cells were transfected with Sendai virus (SeV) based non-integration CytoTune™ iPS Reprogramming Kit (Life Technologies) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Colonies began to appear after 11 days and were picked after three weeks. Three colonies were manually picked and expanded onto mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cells in hiPSC media (DMEM/F-12 (Life Technologies), 20% KSR (Life Technologies), 10 ng/mL bFGF (R & D Systems), 1% nonessential amino acids (Life Technologies), 1% Penicillin-Strepromyocin-Glutamine (Gibco), Primocin™ (Invivogen), and 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma)).

6. Flow cytometry

Single cell suspension was obtained using 0.05% Tryspin (Gibco). hiPSCs were then resuspended in PBS with 1% BSA. Antibody incubation lasted 30 min at 4 °C with conjugated antibodies. An LSRII machine was used to process samples and analysis was conducted using FlowJo software. Flow Cytometry analysis was conducted at P17 for MZT05-D, P17 for MZT05-F, and P17 for MZT05-L.

7. PluriTest

Cryopreserved pelleted cells were sent to Life Sciences Solutions. Transcriptional profiles of the hiPSC lines were compared to an extensive reference set. The Pluripotency Score is an indication of how strongly a model-based pluripotency signature is expressed in the samples analyzed. The Novelty Score indicates the general model fit for a given sample (Müller et al., 2011).

8. Taqman Real-Time PCR

At Day 7 of self-renewal, the hiPSC subliness were trypsinized (0.05% trypsin, Life Technologies) and the MEFs were depleted by plating the cell suspension in tissue culture dishes, two times, for 5 min each. The resulting cell suspensions were pelleted and resuspended in media containing (GMEM) (Life Technologies), 15% KSR (Life Technologies), 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids (Life Technologies), penicillin/streptomycin/L-glutamine (Life Technologies), Primocin™ (Invivogen), 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma), sodium pyruvate (Life Technologies), activin A (PeproTech), CHIR99021 (Stemgent), Y-27632 (Stemgent), filtered through a 40 µm cell strainer (Falcon). The cell suspension was plated at a density of 2.0 × 105 cells per well of a human plasma fibronectin (Invitrogen)-coated 12-well plate. After 24 h of incubation at 37 °C with 5.0% CO2 the cells, now called incipient mesoderm-like cells (iMELCs) were trypsinized (0.05% trypsin) and resuspended in media containing (GMEM) (Life Technologies), 15% KSR (Life Technologies), 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids (Life Technologies), penicillin/streptomycin/L-glutamine (Life Technologies), Primocin™ (Invivogen), 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma), sodium pyruvate (Life Technologies), 10 ng/mL human LIF (EMD Millipore), 200 ng/mL BMP4 (R&D Systems), 50 ng/mL EGF (Fisher Scientific), 10 µM Y-27632 (Stemgent). The cells were plated at a density of 3.0 × 103 cells per well of a low adherence spheroid forming 96-well plate (Corning) and cultured for four additional days. Testing was conducted on MZT05-D (p30), MZT05-L (p31), MZT05-F (P28).

At day 4 of differentiation in low adherence plates, the differentiated cells were harvested in RLT buffer and RNA was extracted using qiagen RNAeasy microkit (qiagen, 74004). RNA was converted to cDNA using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Thermofisher, 18064014) and random hexamers (Thermofisher, N8080127). Taqman probes (Table 3) were used to identify two markers from each germ layer including; ectoderm: OTX2 (72 bp product) (Thermofisher, Hs00222238_m1), NESTIN (58 bp product) (Thermofisher, Hs04187831_g1); endoderm: SOX17 (149 bp product) (Thermofisher, Hs00751752_s1), FOXA2 (144 bp product) (Thermofisher, Hs00610080_m1); mesoderm: TBXT (132 bp product) (Thermofisher, Hs00610080_m1), EOMES (81 bp product) (Thermofisher, Hs00610080_m1). The Taqman assays were run with the following conditions, 50° C for 2 min, 95° C for 10 min, and 50 cycles of 95° C for 15 sec followed by 60° C for 1 min. Three technical replicates were used to examine gene expression in each of the three MZT05 hiPSC sublines. qPCR was performed using CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System. Averages of each hiPSCs subline were normalized to GAPDH expression for the six target genes. hESC line UCLA2 (Diaz Perez et al., 2012) was used to as a control, and delta delta CT was calculated relative this line.

Table 3. Reagents details.

Antibodies used for immunocytochemistry/flow-cytometry
  Antibody Dilution Company Cat # and RRID
Self-renewal markers goat-anti-human OCT4 1:100 Santa Cruz, sc8628
RRID: AB_653551
Self-renewal markers goat-anti-human NANOG 1:40 R&D Systems, AF1997
RRID: AB_355097
Self-renewal markers mouse-anti-human SSEA-4 1:100 Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, MC-813–70
RRID: AB_528477
Self-renewal markers mouse-anti-human TRA-1–81 1:100 eBiosciences, 14–8883-82
RRID: AB_891614
Pluripotency markers SSEA-4-Allophycocyanin 1:30 R&D Systems, FAB1435A
RRID: AB_494994
Pluripotency markers TRA-1–85-Phycoerythrin 1:60 R&D Systems, FAB3195P
RRID: AB_2066683
Pluripotency markers TRA-1–81, Alexa Fluor 488 1:60 Stemcell Technologies, 60065AD
RRID: AB_2721032
Nuclear marker Dapi 1:100 BioVision, B1098-25
RRID: AB_2336790
Secondary antibodies AF488-conjugated donkey-anti-goat 1:200 JacksonImmunoResearch, 705–546-147
RRID: AB_2340430
Secondary antibodies AF488-conjugated donkey-anti-mouse 1:200 Life Technologies, A-21131
RRID: AB_2535771
Primers
  Target Forward/Reverse primer (5′-3′)
Reprogramming virus SeV GGA TCA CTA GGT GAT ATC GAG C/ ACC AGA CAA GAG TTT AAG AGA TAT GTA TC
Reprogramming virus KOS ATG CAC CGC TAC GAC GTG AGC GC/ ACC TTG ACA ATC CTG ATG TGG
Reprogramming virus Klf4 TTC CTG CAT GCC AGA GGA GCC C/ AAT GTA TCG AAG GTG CTC AA
Reprogramming virus c-Myc TAA CTG ACT AGC AGG CTT GTC G/ TCC ACA TAC AGT CCT GGA TGA TGA TG
Taqman assay EOMES Hs00610080_m1
Taqman assay SOX17 Hs00751752_s1
Taqman assay FOXA2 Hs00610080_m1
Taqman assay OTX2 Hs00222238_m1
Taqman assay TBXT Hs00610080_m1
Taqman assay NESTIN Hs04187831_g1
Taqman assay GAPDH Hs02786624_g1

9. Karyotyping and STR analysis

The three hiPSC sublines, and the HDF primary culture that they were derived from, were karyotyped using metaphase spreads and G-banding by Cell Line Genetics (Madison, WI). Karyotyping on hiPSCs was conducted at P6 for MZT05 HDFs primary cell cultures, P14 for MZT05-D, P11 for MZT05-F, and P11 for MZT05-L. Twenty metaphase spreads were counted for each Karyotype analysis. Cell Line Genetics also performed STR analysis on the three hiPSC sublines and one HDF primary culture using the PowerPlex 16 System (cat# DC6531, Promega).

10. Immunofluorescence staining

Immunofluorescence staining was performed by fixing the hiPSCs in 4%PFS for 15 min at room temperature, and then permeabilizing the cells with PBS plus 0.5% Triton™ X-100 (Sigma). The hiPSCs were then blocked in 10% donkey serum (Jackson Immunoresearch) for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies and then were incubated in secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature (Table 3). Cells were incubated with DAPI nuclear stain for 15 min. Immunofluorescence was imaged using a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal laser-scanning microscope. Immunofluorescence analysis was conducted at P15 for MZT05-D, P13 for MZT05-F, and P14 for MZT05-L.

11. Absence of the reprogramming virus

RNA was isolated according to manufacturer’s instructions (cytotune) from reprogrammed fibroblasts at P0 before hiPSCs were picked and cultured to function as the positive control. cDNA was synthesized from the RNA and RT-PCR was performed using primers provided from the manufacturer (Table 3). All hiPSC sublines were tested for absence of the reprogramming virus at P10.

12. Mycoplasma detection

Mycoplasma was regularly tested using MycoAlert kit from Lonza Catalog #LT07-318. We used the Mycoalert kit to calculate the presence of mycosomal enzymes within hiPSC test sample. Through measurement of ADP to ATP conversion both before and after addition of the MycoAlertTM PLUS Substrate, a ratio can be constructed that indicates presence of absence of the virus. Ratios below 1.0 indicate that the sample is negative for mycoplasma, a value over 1.2 indicates presence of mycoplasma in the sample. Mycoplasma analysis was conducted at P20 for MZT05-D, P23 for MZT05-F, and P29 for MZT05-L.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

We are appreciative of the MCDB/BSCRC Imaging Core, BSCRC Flow cytometry core, BSCRC Genomics core. We also thank Jessica Scholes, Felicia Codrea and Jeffrey Calim of the UCLA BSCRC FACS core. In addition, we are grateful to Tsotne Chitiashvili for conducting the mycoplasma testing. Dr. Erica Pandolfi is a postdoctoral fellow supported by UPLIFT: UCLA Postdocs’ Longitudinal Investment in Faculty (Award # K12 GM106996). This project was funded by the Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research Innovation Award (ATC), We also gratefully acknowledge funds from the LucaBella Foundation administered through the Magee Women’s Health Research Institute and Foundation to support this work. Differentiation of UCLA2 was funded by 2R01HD079546 (ATC).

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:


References

Diaz Perez et al., 2012S.V. Diaz Perez, R. Kim, Z. Li, V.E. Marquez, S. Patel, K. Plath, A.T. ClarkDerivation of new human embryonic stem cell lines reveals rapid epigenetic progression in vitro that can be prevented by chemical modification of chromatinHum. Mol. Genet., 21 (2012), pp. 751-764, 10.1093/hmg/ddr506

Müller et al., 2011F.-J. Müller, B.M. Schuldt, R. Williams, D. Mason, G. Altun, E.P. Papapetrou, S. Danner, J.E. Goldmann, A. Herbst, N.O. Schmidt, J.B. Aldenhoff, L.C. Laurent, J.F. LoringA bioinformatic assay for pluripotency in human cellsNat. Methods, 8 (4) (2011), pp. 315-317, 10.1038/nmeth.1580

Pandolfi et al., 2019E.C. Pandolfi, E.J. Rojas, E. Sosa, J.J. Gell, T.J. Hunt, S. Goldsmith, Y. Fan, S.J. Silber, A.T. ClarkGeneration of three human induced pluripotent stem cell sublines (MZT04D, MZT04J, MZT04C) for reproductive science researchStem Cell Res., 40 (2019), p. 101576, 10.1016/j.scr.2019.101576

Pandolfi et al., 2021Pandolfi, E.C., Sosa, E., Hunt, T., Goldsmith, S., Hurlbut, K., Silber, S.J., D, A.C., 2021. Generation of six human induced pluripotent stem cell sublines (MZT01E, MZT01F, MZT01N and MZT02D, MZT02G and MZT02H) for reproductive science research. Stem C.

Tokusumi et al., 2002T. Tokusumi, A. Iida, T. Hirata, A. Kato, Y. Nagai, M. HasegawaRecombinant Sendai viruses expressing different levels of a foreign reporter geneVirus Res., 86 (1-2) (2002), pp. 33-38, 10.1016/S0168-1702(02)00047-3